Why are Clans signed up for RvS, not playing RvS?!?

[Spanke]

Clans: - RnT, GhRa>, [:], .[?], and Po)|
Never CB, and say they DON'T PLAY RvS, just GhR.
o.O
I'm just a newb, but it seems to me this not correct.



cleaned up the subject

[:MoD:Shade]

First - When making a topic name reduce the amount of exclamation points, periods and random 1's.

Second - It's the clans choice wether or not to CB on a ladder.

Third - Clans like Po)| and [:] probably have a very few amount of people who play RvS and therefore they won't be able to cb as much but they still signed up for the ladder just in case they did want to cb.

[Spanke]

ty

[cO.Vickedson]

I'm the only one in [?] that plays RVS.  Once we get some more members I will gladly cb you.

Or I'll take you on 2v1 and probably win beacuse I pwn that shitty game.

[spike]

Clans aren't forced to cb. Their status is inactive until they cb so they won't fuck up the rankings. They can play what they want to play.

I don't think this is going anywhere constructive.

[:MoD:Shade]

Nope, let it die a peaceful death.

[spike]

I was thinking about locking it, but okay, that works also

[~Po~ TiroFino]

Could members of clan that cb on one ladder... join members of clans that cb otrher ladders... for example: I know 80 Proof aka Polonium, would like to cb in the RvS ladder, but we dont have any other members to it it with...could he join forces with Vick (for example) who has the same problem..and maybe others in the same condition and play the RvS ladder under a new clan (or pick one of our clans to represent them)?

Just a thought that may help give the other ladders more activity!

[BFG]

Absolutely Tiro there is nothing to prevent people from doing that - and we have had people do so in the past. In theory if Proof and Vic teamed up with a new clan (we'll call it ProVic) then as long as their 'original' clans didn't start on the ladder there would be nothing wrong with them competing on the ladder as ProVic