So THAT'S How Democrats Get Votes...

[BTs_GhostSniper]

I never knew this was how the democrats got their votes:

Democrat News Story

"Real estate developer and political fund-raiser [for the Democratic Party] Charles Kushner of Livingston, New Jersey, was charged by federal prosecutors Tuesday with conspiracy, obstruction of justice and interstate promotion of prostitution."

[Cossack]

*cough* Enron *cough*

[BTs_Mysterio]

I don't know GS. I think Bush's Dumb-it-Down strategy may be a bit more insulting.

["Sixhits"]

I'm glad you found one bad apple.

Do I even need to name names and instances of the bundles of bad apples in the Republican party?

[Croosch]

I'm glad you found one bad apple.

Do I even need to name names and instances of the bundles of bad apples in the Republican party?

*cough* Bush *cough*

[BTs_Mysterio]

Point for Sixhits. Score

Others:1000000000000 GS: -1

[BTs_GhostSniper]

I'm glad you found one bad apple.

My point is that when democrats bring up one bad apple that is a Republican it gets national media attention on every news broadcast, in every newspaper, and every forum on the internet.  But when somebody shows a bad Democrat, you can barely find an article about it--I'm surprised CNN even reported it.  And even then you have to go somewhere like the Drudge Report or Rush Limbaugh to find out anything about it.

[Croosch]

Am I mistaken or don't the Republicans hold the office right now? it's the other way around when Democrats are in office

[BTs_Mysterio]

GS, incase you can't tell CNN is full of republican ass kissing. At least thats all I see when  I watch it.

[Mr. Lothario]

     Damn the Liberal media! Those manipulative bastards are always scheming, plotting, conniving to get their hands on me frosted lucky charms drag the name of the noble and uncorrupt Republican party through the stinking mud of their LIES! Why do they hate America so MUCH? Can't they see that Big Brother the Politburo our Great Leader and Savior has only our best interests at heart, and that true patriotism looks remarkably like sticking your fingers in your ears and humming?

[BTs_Mysterio]

GO LOTH!

[westamastaflash]

I just wonder why we hear how "bush lied, bush lied!" But I have yet to see one unrefuted piece of evidence! The niger thing? Britian still stands by their intel (as do several other foreign intelligence agencies) and bush didn't even mention niger at all - just africa. WMD's? What about the sarin gas warheads the Poles found - thats a WMD! And all those shipments to syria in the lead up before the war? Look at quotes from all sides of the isle before the war - even John Kerry said that Iraq has WMDs. So why aren't we hearing "Kerry Lied! Kerry Lied!" or "Clinton Lied! Clinton Lied!"

The PROBLEM exists becuase the left does not realize where the mainstream is - they've convienently moved it in their minds so most of their positions border it, thus they don't see any bias - after all, what proper-thinking person wouldn't want guns banned, socialized medicine, and anybody but bush?

Kerry has been shown in the media with nothing but the most positive, glowing reviews from everyone, and bush nothing but negative, negative, negative, and yet the polls STILL don't show massive support for kerry. Yes, I think there are things wrong with bush, and yes i think there are (albeit very few) things right with kerry - but why is kerry the perfect boy scout while bush is satan's roommate?

[BTs_Mysterio]

West, I really don't see that. If there were positive things to report they would be reported.

["Sixhits"]

I'm glad you found one bad apple.

My point is that when democrats bring up one bad apple that is a Republican it gets national media attention on every news broadcast, in every newspaper, and every forum on the internet.  But when somebody shows a bad Democrat, you can barely find an article about it--I'm surprised CNN even reported it.  And even then you have to go somewhere like the Drudge Report or Rush Limbaugh to find out anything about it.

Intersting point:

However, on the scales of National interest, which weighs more?

Ken Lay, major political contributor to Bush, founder of Enron, mysterious economic advisor on energy policy to Cheny, and the man who nearly broke the American economy.

or

Charles Kushner, a realestate developer from New Jersay who was a Democratic fund raiser and interstate pimp.


We can also add in, just for kicks, the Connectuit Governor who's been taking kickbacks for years and recently resigned because he was going to be impeached.

Or Jack Ryan, who was a Senate Cadidate who tried to force his wife into public sex acts.

Or look at it this way Ghost -- this is karmic payback for all those years of scandel-monging during the nineties.  I say swallow your medicine.

["Sixhits"]

I just wonder why we hear how "bush lied, bush lied!" But I have yet to see one unrefuted piece of evidence! The niger thing? Britian still stands by their intel (as do several other foreign intelligence agencies) and bush didn't even mention niger at all - just africa. WMD's? What about the sarin gas warheads the Poles found - thats a WMD! And all those shipments to syria in the lead up before the war? Look at quotes from all sides of the isle before the war - even John Kerry said that Iraq has WMDs. So why aren't we hearing "Kerry Lied! Kerry Lied!" or "Clinton Lied! Clinton Lied!"

The PROBLEM exists becuase the left does not realize where the mainstream is - they've convienently moved it in their minds so most of their positions border it, thus they don't see any bias - after all, what proper-thinking person wouldn't want guns banned, socialized medicine, and anybody but bush?

Kerry has been shown in the media with nothing but the most positive, glowing reviews from everyone, and bush nothing but negative, negative, negative, and yet the polls STILL don't show massive support for kerry. Yes, I think there are things wrong with bush, and yes i think there are (albeit very few) things right with kerry - but why is kerry the perfect boy scout while bush is satan's roommate?

"The niger thing? Britian still stands by their intel (as do several other foreign intelligence agencies)"

Britian no longer stands by their intel. As for the other intelegence offfices around the world, they were all duped by the same piece of falsified intelegence according to the SICR. For example, on page 69 the report it says ..."March 4, 2003, the U.S. Government learned that the French had based their initial assessment that Iraq had attempted to procure uranium from Niger on the same documents that the U.S. had provided to the [IAEA]."

Hmmm.

"WMD's? What about the sarin gas warheads the Poles found - thats a WMD!"

Talk about grasping at straws. You mean a warhead buried on the Iran/Iraq boarder in 1986? With the Sarin all leaked out, only trace amounts remaining? Yah. Clear and fucking present danger, doofus.

"Look at quotes from all sides of the isle before the war - even John Kerry said that Iraq has WMDs."

Many people THOUGHT that Iraq had WMDs. Only the White House was in a postition to learn the truth -- they do have variace agencies to help them. And the White House overtly attempted to manipulate those agencies and stove pipe them with what they wanted to hear.

Believing something does not make it true. Actively attempting to manipulate evidence so that it appears that what you believe is true is scandelous.

"The PROBLEM exists becuase the left does not realize where the mainstream is - they've convienently moved it in their minds so most of their positions border it, thus they don't see any bias - after all, what proper-thinking person wouldn't want guns banned, socialized medicine, and anybody but bush? "

Yeah.  The Dems are so far off base that more than fifty percent of the public voted for them last election, and currently more than fifty percent are willing to vote for them again. We're sooooo outa touch.

Oh yah, what happened to that incredibly popular Hate Amendment? The one to amend to the Constitutiona to ban gay marriages? Which side did the country break towards? Which side did the Senate, controled by Reps, break towards?

Mmmm mmm?

"Kerry has been shown in the media with nothing but the most positive, glowing reviews from everyone, and bush nothing but negative, negative, negative, and yet the polls STILL don't show massive support for kerry."

Huh? Which media are you talking about? France's? Cause what I get to see is an incredible bias towards the right. And Bush is getting hammered in the polls -- more than 50% disapprove of the way he's run his office, and more than 50% believe we should never have invaded Iraq. Couple with with the President's $80 million negative ad buy -- with such ads as various Dem's face intercut with images of Hitler -- and boy, yah! The media is so against him! No, the country is against him. Time for you wingers to wake up.