*DAMN R6
.:Navigation:| Home | Battle League | Forum | Mac Downloads | PC Downloads | Cocobolo Mods |:.

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 29, 2024, 08:35:36 am

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
One Worldwide Gaming Community since 13th June 2000
132955 Posts in 8693 Topics by 2294 Members
Latest Member: xoclipse2020
* Home Help Search Login Register
 Ads
+  *DAMN R6 Forum
|-+  *DAMN R6 Community
| |-+  Cocobolo Mods (Moderators: Cobra6, Cocobolo)
| | |-+  L-MG's v. C-mags
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: L-MG's v. C-mags  (Read 1041 times)
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
kammando
Guest
« on: December 23, 2001, 01:42:29 pm »

is an m16 with a c-mag more stable than an m249 on bi-pod?
why i ask is because anybody that played mods like LWM5. i like a lot a bullets but the recoil was heavy.
an m16 is pretty accurate with the extra weight of C_mag should make i more accurate.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
Cobra6
Moderator
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1099


Lead...Follow, or Get The Hell Out Of The WAY!! ?


« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2001, 03:24:11 pm »

A M249 on a bipod is very accurate, probably out to 800 meters. An M-16 with a CMAG on full auto will be all over the place because of the recoil, but youcan add a bipod to the M16 and it becomes very effective, but still not as accurate as a SAW (M249)
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
{E}LuSiVe
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 305


too late! viva taco bell...


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2001, 11:11:33 pm »

Love the cool icon, Cobra. Smiley
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged

{E}LuSiVe[/u][/i]
---

---
"THREE DOLLARS! Cool, that gets me another scratch-off..."
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



 Ads
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 19 queries.