*DAMN R6
.:Navigation:| Home | Battle League | Forum | Mac Downloads | PC Downloads | Cocobolo Mods |:.

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 27, 2024, 09:15:29 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
One Worldwide Gaming Community since 13th June 2000
132955 Posts in 8693 Topics by 2294 Members
Latest Member: xoclipse2020
* Home Help Search Login Register
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: 2 vs 2 clanbattles!? Your opinion counts!  (Read 4393 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
*DAMN Mauti
Guest
« on: April 29, 2001, 06:03:58 am »

Once ago we allowed 2 vs 2 clanbattles but we changed to a minimum of 3 vs 3 to play a cb. We did so because if you play a 2 vs. 2 it is only the host and a friend and you have total host advantage. However ICE Gladiator would like to have a 2 vs 2 reallowed. What do you think. Please post your opinion the majority will decide if we allow 2 vs 2 cbs again.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
jn.wrath
Special Forces
Forum Whore
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 586


kill whitey


« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2001, 12:17:45 pm »

Well, the logic behind not allowing 2v2 is faulty, with 3v3 it could also be the host and TWO of his friends, so it doesn't really stand up to a closer inspection. I'm all for 2v2 to be allowed.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged

goddammit this blows
?SWAT? Tempest
Guest
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2001, 12:24:48 pm »

Allow them
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
*DAMN Mauti
Guest
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2001, 12:35:53 pm »

Since all of my clan members are my neighbors i have talked to them and they
said,

                               Yes to 2v2 clanbattles

because only us 3 really come to the cbs cause i dont know how to contact the
others and 1 of those 3 is on pc so its easier for 2v2 cbs.

CQSnipe and the MARINES
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
*DAMN Mauti
Guest
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2001, 12:36:26 pm »

yes i agree i think 2vs2 should be allowed.

LMS
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
||ICE|| GLADIATOR
Guest
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2001, 12:43:57 pm »

I think 2 vs 2 clan battles should be aloud because many times many of the clans do not have 3 people on and it would be alot easier for clans to battle. Some clans like HARM and FEAR are not that big and it is very hard to find 3 people on at a time. But having 2 also has an advantage that you could clan battle with the 2 best people in your clan  and win alot. Mauti will get more clan battle emails saying who one or who lost and it will make the RS community a better place and also it will be more competitive!!
||ICE|| GLADIATOR
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
Macs
Guest
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2001, 01:03:28 pm »

what wrath said.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
Redbaron
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2001, 01:04:51 pm »

I'll say yes to 2v2 clan battles.

(SEALs) Redbaron.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged

Redbaron.
[PENs] Rocky
Guest
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2001, 01:17:06 pm »

That's a great idea, I hope all of you pals make sure to be good and play 2v2 caln battles, my clan normally only has about 2 pals online at once so if we are to ever get to play then we need this pal.

Have a good day pal.

?[PENs] Rocky
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
Clark
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2001, 04:16:16 pm »

no they shoud not be allowed.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged

[T&A] is like the new coke, it is never going to die.
*DAMN Bander
*DAMN [SF]
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 367


na mach schon, blas ...


« Reply #10 on: April 29, 2001, 04:44:09 pm »

i agree with clark:

i am 100% against a 2 vs 2 CB rule.

why? me and mauti for excemple live in same town and have excellent ping to each other.
if u would CBing us 2 u would have to face a double host here. same is with other people.
and i say: if u cant organize ur clan to be more than 3 members its really poor.

but - ok: it seems im outnumbered in votes - and if it keeps that way i will be a democratic person as well Wink

for my (other) clan #SKUL i can tell u all now and here that we will play 3 vs 3 minimum only.

okay - that was my op. to this (as it always was)

*DAMN Bander
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged

Second Khan of Clan DAMN
||ICE|| JaggedEdge
Guest
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2001, 05:57:39 pm »

YES LIKE GLAD SAID SOME SMALLER CLANS DONT HAVE MANY MEMEBERS AND HARD TO FIND 3 AT A TIME SO IM FOR 2 vs 2 CBS
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
||ICE|| JaggedEdge
Guest
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2001, 05:57:49 pm »

YES LIKE GLAD SAID SOME SMALLER CLANS DONT HAVE MANY MEMEBERS AND HARD TO FIND 3 AT A TIME SO IM FOR 2 vs 2 CBS
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
<SSWAT> Commander
Guest
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2001, 09:28:08 pm »

I really dont care i usually have more than 2 ppl on so 3 person cbs r ok
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
~GaB~ Ultimo
Guest
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2001, 09:34:31 pm »

YES!
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
KrayzeeMunkee
Guest
« Reply #15 on: April 29, 2001, 09:55:48 pm »

I am two sided for this, I think that a clan battle is for a CLAN, not for 2 or 4 people to play, it should be about the clan, but then there are clans that dont have many people, have people with slow connections, or just have people who dont play CB's, hats where I think 2v2 is ok. But you can count my vote against 2v2
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
|| ICE || 13th Warrior
Guest
« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2001, 12:31:37 am »

CB seem to be hard to organize to bad a third party couldn't host for a Clan battle to make it more fair so no host advantage is factored into the fight.   But as far as I can see 2v2 or 3v3 no consequence.  Really what we all would like to see is MacSoft try to come out with a few patches once in a while to let us know they care about their games..ie few things that might improve the game is give the host the ability to green everyone up that brain dead..Smiley.!! and a ban player totally from the game ie game tk'ers.  And maybe some bug fixes...hmm well that's my silver bullets worth.



So you can count me for YES 2v2.
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
|RAIN| HockeyGuy
Guest
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2001, 01:43:10 am »

I really dont care if theres 2v2 allowed but what the hey why not. Ill go with wrathy.



AIM: NHL HockeyGuy99
ICQ:88901243
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
<=SP<sum>AR>= i_roc
Guest
« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2001, 04:17:30 am »

of course they should be allowed im all for it!
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
|-FEAR-| ?AuS
Guest
« Reply #19 on: April 30, 2001, 12:05:50 pm »

Yes 2v2 should be allowed. If you want to know my reasoning look at Glad's post. A lot of times there isn't 3 people on from each clan at the same time. So put them back up Mauti! Smiley
« Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by 1029654000 » Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



 Ads
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 18 queries.