*DAMN R6
.:Navigation:| Home | Battle League | Forum | Mac Downloads | PC Downloads | Cocobolo Mods |:.

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 26, 2024, 09:40:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
One Worldwide Gaming Community since 13th June 2000
132955 Posts in 8693 Topics by 2294 Members
Latest Member: xoclipse2020
* Home Help Search Login Register
 Ads
+  *DAMN R6 Forum
|-+  *DAMN R6 Community
| |-+  General Gossip (Moderators: Grifter, cookie, *DAMN Hazard, c| Lone-Wolf, BTs_GhostSniper)
| | |-+  ahaha, rogue spear is dead
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: ahaha, rogue spear is dead  (Read 1989 times)
0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
?c.w.u? Rabid
Guest
« Reply #20 on: November 17, 2002, 09:05:26 am »

nah RS isn't dead I still see alot of people playing it. GhRD sucks I'm sticking with RS till I get full. I like RS better becaue I like swat team but if I wanted to play a army game I would play GhR.
Logged
Bondo
Guest
« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2002, 03:50:46 pm »

Well...that is certainly a relief that the clan whores aren't game whores as well.
Logged
Mr.Mellow
Official ass-kisser
Forum Whore
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 879


m00t!


« Reply #22 on: November 17, 2002, 11:31:46 pm »

hah! Err anyhoo..I don't see how you can compare GhR to RS and R6. GhR is not a sequel in the R6 series, while RS was. GhR is a tactical war simulation, while R6/RS is a tactical..uh..terrorist..killing game..in..close quarters(TTKGiCQ). The only thing similar between GhR and the R6 series is that they're both Tom Clancy games, and that they're tactical first-person shooters. That does make them pretty similar, except for..a lot of things. JUST TAKE MY WORD ON IT DAMMIT! Oh, and to the people who whine about the lack of CQB in GhR: Go back to RS then. GhR isn't meant to have loads of CQB, it's more..tactical. So, if you want to play a game where all you do is sidestep and shoot, play RS or R6. Yes, R6 pwns RS. No matter how good a sequel is, it's never as good as the original, even if the sequel is the most amazing thing you'll ever play..simply because the original is the..original. Not to mention R6 is more fun (3 shot burst pwns in R6) Ugh, my mind is a human wasteland today, so I'll shut up now.
Logged

It puts itself on ice...It puts itself on ice, or else it gets the orange juice again!

m00t, I am the Screwer of Squirming Citrus.
(SiX)Ben
Forum Whore
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 562


I love my *NADS


« Reply #23 on: November 18, 2002, 03:51:42 am »

Nice Bondo Smiley..

Mellow, I don't think people were comparing the two, just deciding which to play/stick with... Oh, and I do believe your right... R6 does pwn RS! Oh, and they are more similar then you think. The main difference is one is for more sniping, the other for rushing. Man, first persons hooter games are going so downhill in CQC, R6 is the best CQC, then came RS (not so good) and now ghr (basically none)... Wow!

Ben
Logged

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security."
Benjamin Franklin
-Bodacious-
Guest
« Reply #24 on: November 18, 2002, 04:13:52 am »

Well, R6 Graphics are too ancient, which is why I don't see it even comparing to RS at all, but it does have the basic idea, which is where RS came from.  GhR is the same.  I play lots of GhRD now and find that it's 2 different tactical games.  One has more Sniping and the other has more CQB.  In the end, they both have both! lol!  So it's just what you get used to more, or how some put it, which ones you "PWN" at.  RS is still very competitive and it won't die any day soon.  Of course there is the day for RavenShield?...  Then all games are pretty much, dead.  Cool
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



 Ads
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 19 queries.