*DAMN R6 Forum

After weeks of work I've completed my 1st Ghost Recon map called "Ghost Village".  Monoman has been nice enough to do all the scripting work on the map so it will be playable.  I plan on doing an entire Map Pack of about 5 or 6 maps, my 2nd map is also very close to being finished.  I also got in contact with the person who converted DeDust for Ghost Recon and he gave me his 3D file of the map so I can clean up the glitches, the new DeDust will be included with the maps.

      =US= PUNiSHER



(http://members.aol.com/thepunisher428/village.jpg)

PUNiSHER... you are the pwn.  I think you are doing a great thing here for the community.  The map looks simple awesome from what i see.  This is JUST what we need a map maker who actually PLAYS!

Nice work pun.
Is it up for download yet ?

looks really similar to the Ghost Recon 2 version, good job

Very cool, punisher.

- De_Dust without glitches? that means we can play it again?  ( Would be great )

- i would really love, if someone could make de_dust2 for GhR/Mac. Anyway i know i'm asking for too much.

Good job, looking forward to try it out?

URL for downloads?

Thanx -

Stripes,  de_dust is too small for play in cb's anyway, the wz should be moved to inside the passages, more in the middle and less spawn biased there.  I dont think the current de_dust (Even glitch free) should become playable again.


Pun, It looks awesome.  I hope you can get us a DL link up soon so that we can test it out, people are wanting to possibly include it in the DBL pack, but I know the admins are workin hard to get all that info put together for the DBL pack, and they wanna get it out as quick as possible, so if we could have a download of this map as soon as possible to try out, that would be AWESOME!

Dark.

Which spawns have the advantage?

I agree it's a small map but so is Training.  Problem with thoes maps is the OICW/GL rules - this brings up the spam issue again which I feel is too bad that the vote didn't pass.

Dark, think before you talk.


People still play cqb's, it's a good CQB map. i asked punisher for making de_dust2 for GhR, this don't mean it has to be played in the *DBL - i just wanted to play some public games with this map, cause i really it. 


Stripes

stripes, i don't think he's making de_dust2...i just think he's remaking the original dust.  Although de_dust2 is about 100x better.

He is making de_Dust2, watch and see  :D.

He began to work on it yesterday, after i asked him for it


Can't wait.

What the hell is De Dust 2?

A kickass map.

It's a counter-strike map, just like de_dust.

Couldn't agree with ya more Shade.

There is NO problem with the rate of fire on the OCIW/GL... If one guy fires 12 nades at me because he sees me, more power to him, it's a weapon at his disposal.


The REAL problem comes in when you have a 4v4 cb and 3 of their guys have GL's and then you have 36 nades within seconds.  THIS is what what GL-spamming is to me.  A flurry of nades- not by one guy, but by a TEAM- within seconds when I havent even been seen.  It's just spraying an area and hoping you get lucky.

Almost makes me wish we had kit restrictions like in First to Fight, where only one man can take a certain kit.


Imagine a 5v5 where each guy could only take 1 kit.... 1 OICW, 1 OICWGL, 1 SA80/frags, 1 Socom, 1 SA80 rockets.... in my opinion it might play more tactically considering the importance of where you placed your sensors and your GL man.

not that I am championing for this to be done, but what do you guys think if this was an option?

so what would you do if you were in a public 7v7 game .. poor guy would be stuck with a bizon because everyone already took the good guns.

i only meant cbs... and just threw out an idea... thanks for shooting it down, leenhole.

No that sounds cool weak - not sure if it's possible or not though.

The map plays excellent I really like it. However I have to test the Warzone in real combat situations.

A perfect map for CQB, FFA and Domination! I love it  ::applause:: Btw when can I put it up on the Mac Downloads!?

Bye,

Mauti

Well maybe something as harsh as - if one team takes more than one OICW or SA80 then it's an automatic loss for them.

Honestly I dont think this is a good idea, BUT Im willing to compromise,

2 OICW sensors
2 OICW GL
2 SA80 Hand Nades/Rockets

thats for 4-6 man cb

with a 3 man I guess you COULD restrict it to one of each, but I dont like that idea.

7 + man cb's (while rare) you could have 3 of one of those. or however many is necessary.

P.S. I think most clans already change it up with the kits.  Not everyone takes sensors, not everyone takes nades/GL.  I dont think this is something that the DBL should try to force.

We discussed this in the GhR meeting after season X had ended... we discussed it as a seperate gametype but from all I remember it was sortof a forgotten idea in the Admin section. Maybe I'm wrong?

I don't remember the exact requirements we discussed, but if an admin would be kind enough to post the logs we recorded of this issue (the AA Style gametype) it would be greatly appreciated. ;D

GL spam really only becomes a problem on a few maps... like ghost town.  You can easily corner and see the entire map... well most of it.  Then all you have to do it call in an airstrike.  That's the sorta map where in a 4v4, three of the members usually take GL's and just spam the snot out of you.


Like I said, it's just an idea.  I dont know how most of the community feels about it.  I like the way its works in FtF, but of course FtF is only 4v4 max and is usually very cqb.