*DAMN R6 Forum

*DAMN R6 Community => General Gossip => Topic started by: c| Spetsnaz. on January 22, 2005, 06:58:45 am



Title: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: c| Spetsnaz. on January 22, 2005, 06:58:45 am
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

The following is a synopsis of the case against Dick Cheney who was named as the prime suspect in the crimes on 9/11 by Michael C. Ruppert in Crossing the Rubicon.

MEANS: Dick Cheney and the Secret Service
Cheney was Commander in Chief on 9/11 calling the shots via Secret Service.


 Secret Service has the legal authority to take supreme command over all agencies in the United States in time of a national emergency on U.S. soil. Even the Air Force recognizes Secret Service supremacy. Secret Service has the highest technological communication systems of any agency in the U.S. - as it should. On 9/11 Secret Service had the technology to see FAA radar screens in real time. Secret Service was in the decision-making loop as early as 8:15am on 9/11, no later than 8:45am. Everything was in place on 9/11 for the Commander in Chief to have full supreme control of the Air Force via the Secret Service communication systems and legal mandate to take supreme command.

However, Bush was reading about goats in Booker Elementary School. Secret Service was within arms' reach, and they chose to keep him there as the 9/11 plot unfolded. Bush's Secret Service detail was in full communication with Cheney's Secret Service agents in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) as the 9/11 plot unfolded.

Dick Cheney was the acting Commander in Chief on 9/11 and Secret Service was the supreme command.

MOTIVE: Peak Oil
The world is about to start running out of oil.


Half of the world's oil has been, or is about to be, exhausted. Once that midpoint is crossed, every barrel of oil will be harder to find, and more expensive, as demand grows. Controlling the last remaining oil reserves is the key to controlling the world. Almost everything in modern society - vehicles, buildings, bridges, weapons, consumer products, and much more - consumes oil in its manufacture, its operation, or both. Cheap and abundant hydrocarbon energy keeps the industrial world warm and cooks our food. Most houses are heated with natural gas. We "eat" oil and natural gas: For every 1-calorie of food energy produced, 10 calories of hydrocarbon energy is consumed.

Four days after becoming Vice President, Dick Cheney convened his National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG) in which he received extensive information on Peak Oil from world-renowned experts. He has refused to release the documents from those hearings to Congress or the American people. FTW has always contended that the deepest, darkest secrets of 9/11 lie in those documents.

Dick Cheney knew about Peak Oil at least as early as 1999. He knows the economic impact of oil depletion and the catastrophic effects that will result.

9/11 made possible what Dick Cheney called, "The war that won't end in our lifetimes." This is a war that is chasing the last remaining hydrocarbons across the globe. The "war on terror" is in reality an energy war and 9/11 was its pretext.



OPPORTUNITY: 9/11 War Games
Cheney was managing multiple war games and terror drills on 9/11 that paralyzed U.S. Air Force response.


In May of 2001 Dick Cheney was placed directly in charge of managing the "seamless integration" of all training exercises throughout the federal government and military agencies by presidential mandate.

The morning of 9/11 began with multiple training exercises of war games and terror drills which Cheney, as mandated by the president, was placed in charge of managing.

War games & terror drills included live-fly exercises with military aircraft posing as hijacked aircraft over the United States, as well as simulated exercises that placed "false blips" (radar injects indicating virtual planes) on FAA radar screens. One exercise titled NORTHERN VIGILANCE pulled Air Force fighters up into Canada simulating a Russian air attack, so there were very few fighters remaining on the east coast to respond. All of this paralyzed Air Force response ensuring that fighter jocks couldn't stop 9/11.

An unknown individual or command center referred to by Major Don Arias of NORAD as the "maestro" coordinated the war games. It is possible there was more than one maestro, but no one will name names. FTW has asked this question of everyone in relevant government and military positions, to no avail. Our investigation has found the maestro was either Dick Cheney, General Ralph "Ed" Eberhart, or both.

Whoever was coordinating the Air Force war games was under the management and direction of Dick Cheney, who was also in charge of managing a terror drill being set up on the West Side of downtown New York on 9/11 titled Tripod 2. This exercise set up a command and control center on 9/11 that was configured exactly like the one lost that morning in WTC 7. It was the perfect command center to respond to the crisis, and it was under Dick Cheney's management before the hijackings occurred. How convenient.

Dick Cheney was one of the main government officials deciding that such extensive war games would take place on 9/11. This was when American intelligence had collected dozens of warnings from governments and intelligence agencies indicating that terrorists were planning to hijack civilian aircraft and crash them into American targets on the ground during the week of September 9th, 2001.

http://www.911truth.org/


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: *DAMN Bondo on January 22, 2005, 02:50:18 pm
Uh huh...9/11 truth eh?

Coincidence and conjecture does not equal truth.

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Just because 9/11 resulted in neoconservative heaven, doesn't mean they caused 9/11.


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: BFG on January 22, 2005, 08:51:05 pm
I think the very idea of the possibility of it is so horrific that nobody can bear even contemplating the possibility of it...

No question he's a nasty little shit though and the place would be much nicer if he would hurry up and die.


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: c| Spetsnaz. on January 22, 2005, 09:55:42 pm
What does equal truth?


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: BFG on January 22, 2005, 10:09:20 pm
hehe - what ever the good guys say of course ;)



Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: c| Spetsnaz. on January 22, 2005, 10:47:58 pm
In my opinion, 9/11 was to the United Sates as the Reichstag fire was to Nazi Germany.

Also, the whole official report made by the Kean commission is a logical fallacy. Just like the Warren commission did no more than cover the tracks of the guilty. 

I'm not saying I believe every claim of Ruppert's indictment. I'm just pointing out that there are more than enough anomalies to question the "official" story repeated by the media and figures of authority. Also, it is a little odd that those who were responsible for protecting the American people that day received promotions (ie. Gen. Richard Meyers, Condi Rice ect...). And why did the Pakistani ISI wire Mohammed Atta $100,000 months before the attack? Why was there out of the ordinary insider trading on both airline's stock days before the attack? Why were 6 different investigations that could have prevented the attacks snubbed out? Why does the current nominee for Sec. of Homeland Security have ties to 9/11 financiers http://www.universitystar.com/main/article.php?aid=1236? Why was the U.S. planning on invading Afghanistan months prior to the attacks? Why was the chief of the Pakistani ISI who purportedly wired $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, in Washington on the day of the attacks? And so many, many more questions that were never acknowledged by the official investigation.

For those who cannot comprehend that the Government would harm its citizens to achieve a political ends, I suggest you check out "Operation Northwoods" (make sure you look at the original declassified gov't documents). http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/11_20_01_op_nwoods.html

This topic is worth critically thinking about.
 


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: seth on January 23, 2005, 06:05:13 pm


No question he's a nasty little shit though and the place would be much nicer if he would hurry up and die.

and if he could take Condoleeza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld with him, it would even be better !


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: BFG on January 23, 2005, 06:13:24 pm
Indeed the three of them can go to hell in a basket.   


The thing i wonder about these conspiracy ideas is that it suggests these people are actually intelligent- i mean can anyone honestly believe that the bush administration could have come up with it all? ... and if they did what does that say about the intelligence of everyone else if they haven't been routed for doing it


Title: Re: The Case Against Cheney
Post by: seth on January 24, 2005, 02:52:24 am
Indeed the three of them can go to hell in a basket.   


The thing i wonder about these conspiracy ideas is that it suggests these people are actually intelligent- i mean can anyone honestly believe that the bush administration could have come up with it all? ... and if they did what does that say about the intelligence of everyone else if they haven't been routed for doing it

i'm pretty sure there is a whole bunch of shit that this administration, and the previous ones, did, but that 9/11 conspiracy seems too big to be true.