|
Title: AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: l ! l Ross on June 28, 2004, 01:07:34 am Quote Here is what I know... ver 2.2 Late Fall 2004 (will use the UT 2004 Engine). The merge of our code to UT2004 will be wrapped up very soon. Overmatch_Currently planned for April 2005 (will also use UT2004 engine) We received UE3 code at our dev sites last week (AAPA, AAGA,AAFA). We are in the process of evaluating it for future releases. We'll need to do a lot of work and re-architecting to get ready for UE3 since it is a complete rewrite for Epic. This effort will be going on in parallel with development efforts on ver 2.2 and Overmatch. -skyhuntr http://forum.americasarmy.com/viewtopic.php?t=54798&sid= Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 28, 2004, 02:33:59 am So this basically all means we will get all sorts of military vehicles! Yay UT2k4!
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: crypt on June 28, 2004, 02:36:24 am Do you think mac will see this version? Wait, what do i care, i can't run AA as it is. YAY!
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 28, 2004, 03:28:20 am Mac has Ut2k4 noob.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: John Doe on June 28, 2004, 05:55:27 am Hes talking about AA's shitty framerates....
........ Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_GhostSniper on June 28, 2004, 06:54:29 am Hes talking about AA's shitty framerates.... Shitty Framerates??? My fps on AA never drops below 50, and most of the time it is at 70 or above. So maybe you need to trade in your 700MHz G3 iMac for a REAL computer.[/size] ;) Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: crypt on June 28, 2004, 07:06:59 am It's actually 800 MHz G4 but that's ok. Still need a real computer.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 28, 2004, 05:10:07 pm AA isn't the best game for FPS. I mean they use the UT2k3 engine. I get 200-250 FPS in UT2k3 with patches. AA I get 50-95. Still very play able but somewhat saddening to see my G5 struggle to get near 100.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BFG on June 28, 2004, 05:47:41 pm Quote Mac has Ut2k4 noob. But that dosn't guarantee a mac version of AA... hell it just makes it a wee bit more likely fingers crossed ;) Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_GhostSniper on June 28, 2004, 08:05:04 pm AA isn't the best game for FPS. I mean they use the UT2k3 engine. I get 200-250 FPS in UT2k3 with patches. AA I get 50-95. Still very play able but somewhat saddening to see my G5 struggle to get near 100. The human eye can not detect anything much faster than 35 fps, so what does it matter that you are not getting 200 fps in AA? I mean, really, I can not tell the difference between 40 fps and 90 fps in AA. And honestly, the only way you know what your frame rate is when it is above 35 is by typing into your consol "stat fps". Otherwise you would be clueless. Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 29, 2004, 02:24:16 am GS you can tell the difference, when you turn your head in a game 40 FPs won't seem as smooth as 100.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_GhostSniper on June 29, 2004, 02:35:39 am GS you can tell the difference, when you turn your head in a game 40 FPs won't seem as smooth as 100. No, I said I CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE! You are telling me what I see and don't see???[/size] Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 29, 2004, 03:11:54 am Well, with the text size you need I'm sure I can GS.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BFG on June 29, 2004, 11:54:16 am Well maybe you can't... most of us can sure as hell tell a difference though!
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: crypt on June 29, 2004, 05:57:55 pm Hell it pisses me off that you guys are even discerning between 40 and 100 while I struggle at 10-15, jesus just give me 30!
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 29, 2004, 06:44:45 pm Crypt and his 10 FPs....crazy kids....
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BFG on June 29, 2004, 09:48:26 pm lol your not the only one crypt. Hell on a map like SF hospital i get a average of between 4 and 10 FPS - if im lucky somtimes.
And this is on a duel 1GHz G4 with 1GB of RAM... its the damn freaking Geforce4MX card :( Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_GhostSniper on June 29, 2004, 10:04:46 pm And this is on a duel 1GHz G4 with 1GB of RAM... its the damn freaking Geforce4MX card :( Havn't you heard? The PowerMac G5 is HERE! Time to put anything less in a museum. ;) Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 30, 2004, 04:05:31 am GS, some here aren't quite as into wasting money as some of us.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_GhostSniper on June 30, 2004, 04:23:50 am GS, some here aren't quite as into wasting money as some of us. BITE YOUR TONGUE! How dare you say that buying a G5 is a waste of money! ***GhostSniper calls for Mysterio to be banished forever for that statement![/size] Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on June 30, 2004, 04:35:50 am Objection on the grounds I was here first and have a better G5. GS fell for the single 1.8 therefore waste of money.
Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: [01] Dark on July 01, 2004, 01:00:15 am Maybe not all of us have the money to "spend" might be a better way of putting it. Were as you seem to have alot of money to throw around. Title: Re:AA 2.2 and beyond Post by: BTs_Mysterio on July 01, 2004, 04:34:45 am Perhaps, but go AA!
|