*DAMN R6 Forum

*DAMN R6 Community => General Gossip => Topic started by: "Sixhits" on February 17, 2004, 11:52:31 pm



Title: Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: "Sixhits" on February 17, 2004, 11:52:31 pm
Posted without comment.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: BTs_GhostSniper on February 17, 2004, 11:58:11 pm
Camping is definitely worse.  Nobody likes a camper.  As for Spawn Killing....I don't have a problem with it at all.  If your team is so weak and individual-minded (versus playing as a TEAM) as to not protect their spawn, then they deserve to get spawn killed.  Also, more times than not I can effectively defeat a spawn killer on the second respawn because I paid attention to where he shot me from the first time he killed me.  Just me though....I know many of you aren't that skilled at the game  :)

-GhostSniper Out.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: crypt on February 18, 2004, 12:06:50 am
Easy, camping is gay, while at the same time spawn killing is gay too, the difference? You can stop spawnkilling by playing no spawns. :)


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: KGB on February 18, 2004, 01:33:26 am
What about camping at the spawnpoint and then spawnkilling.
That is what frustrates me the worst.
I'm also for not having any spawns at all, but what if your on some guys server that has spawns on ?
In my view if you find yourself in the enemies spawn area, get out of there as soon as possible.
What is the fun in sticking around there and sk'ing; it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
It's not sportsmans-like and it does not reflect your skills.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: BTs_Lee.Harvey on February 18, 2004, 01:40:57 am
I make it my goal to try to RUN THROUGH the enimies spawn al least ones in a room where spawns are allowed for the fun of it. If you run through someones spaw.. you might spawn kill a few guys but there is always that guy who spawns behind you while you are tring to run through the spawn and get you. Kinda like a drive by..... w/ out the car.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: "Sixhits" on February 18, 2004, 01:45:46 am
I guess, KGB, that the whole point of the game is what pushing me to not be bothered by SKs. The game is about shooting the other guy. Anything that lets you do that is what that game is about.

I've even had some hesitancy in cusing out glitchers. This is because, even a glitcher is vulnerable from behind. Glitches are known errors in the game, so I feel like they are open to both sides, just like SKs. The difference for me is that it's really, really hard to regulate SKs, and any regulation has to be punitive and after the fact, while regulating glitches is pretty easy (educate people on ditches, etc).

Be sneaky, be aggressive, get to that spawn point, and shoot the fish in the barrel. They deserve it, you earned it. Next game, may they play better.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: |MP|Buccaneer on February 18, 2004, 05:24:33 am
I posted this in Snipe's thread too, but it belongs here.

Camping is worse than Spawn Killing, because good servers will set an invincible time of 5 or 10 seconds, so you can make your way to cover and at least have a shot at defending yourself.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: BFG on February 18, 2004, 06:04:41 pm
looks like people dislike spawn killers more though


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: seth on February 18, 2004, 08:44:26 pm
i think spwan killing is worse.

When you sk, you restrain other players from fairly playing a game. And the "protect your spwans" is bs, since it is sometimes impossible to do so.


Title: Re:Camping v Spawn Killing: Which is Worse?
Post by: |MP|Buccaneer on February 18, 2004, 09:04:32 pm
which poll are you reading?