|
Title: Question about clan "FT:" Post by: AK_Rap1d on January 21, 2003, 12:07:05 am Well, I see that they're registered in BL. My question is, are they CB'ing like a regular clan?
And since they're FiRE trainees, are they allowed to CB FiRE? How does this work? I just wouldn't want to see FT: CB FiRE 3 times, and then decline all other clans from a CB. That just would not work or be considered legit. Mb a FiRE representative can explain this one to me. Thanks. -Rapid- 8) Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: †FiRE Infection on January 21, 2003, 12:43:28 am Rapid, if they are on, you can cb them like another clan. They were added so that there wasn't another mistake like we had with our first cb with you. I suppose Fire could cb them but trust me if we did others would be able to also and it would be for training purposes. So Rapid if they are on, you are allowed to cb them, that's why they are on the ladder. But don't ask me if you can, because it's up to them if they want to. But this wasn't done to be cheap like that. It was done to avoid a mistake like the first cb.
P.S. this also wasn't done so that AK or KoS could cb them 4 times. They are trainees :) Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: †FiRE Infection on January 21, 2003, 01:27:50 am "Fire would only cb FT for trainee purposes" What do you think this means? Ofcourse it's not for the ladder. You can be very thickhead. We don't think like that and we had no intention of cbing them for the ladder, you were the one who brought the whole thing up.
Title: FiRE would NOT be able to CB "FT:" Post by: AK_Rap1d on January 21, 2003, 01:29:08 am I suppose Fire could cb them but trust me if we did others would be able to also and it would be for training purposes. Ok, it will stay for training and not to count. Otherwise Every clan would have a "trainee clan" they could CB and count for the ladder to their advantage... As long as you see that point Our clan was going to do the same wih |?K|, but we saw how unfair that is to our advanatage(Because we knew we could own our trainees and give us "free" points to our advantage). It's rather simple logic. Also, our first CB this season was vs. FiRE since Rabid was a full member and WaffleBoy was the "confused trainee". I wouldn't want you to manipulate things to be "|?K| beat FT: and not FiRE". We challenged anybody and your clan stepped up to the challenge. Do not go twisting things now please... That's just not to be fixed after the fact... That's just too manipulative with your Mod powers... Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: †FiRE Infection on January 21, 2003, 01:31:24 am The post above yours is the answer to that we had no intention to cb our members for points. You have to understand I don't think like that, although technically we could cb them we would never do it. This sorta goes into the unwritten rules of being a leader and honest that I was talking about.
Now what do you mean manipulative of my mod powers? How am I abusing them now sir? Title: FiRE only showing 2 losses. They have 3. Post by: AK_Rap1d on January 21, 2003, 01:37:49 am Right now I'm seeing your clan listing 2 losses. You've lost to us, to TF6 and to RnT. Why is it now showing 3 losses for your clan?
Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: .vooDoo. on January 21, 2003, 01:51:02 am Rapid, on the bl main page u can use the matchlist link to look up any clans stats. I suggest you take a look. ;)
Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: †FiRE Infection on January 21, 2003, 02:00:40 am I'm not sure what you guys are talking about but I'm done with you Rapid. The only reason you are bothering me about my training clan is because Fire is in first place. Just leave me alone man. I'm not cbing you or your clan. I'm done with you guys. I don't care what else you say in this thread I'm not responding.
Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: AK_Rap1d on January 21, 2003, 02:04:00 am Right. In the MatchList it says RnT defeated FT:, but in the BL News it says:
Quote RnT defeats Fire in a 3v3 RS match 7-5. Inputed by Fire Infection![/color][/b][/size]??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: AK_Rap1d on January 21, 2003, 04:33:27 am BAH!
So now you went back and changed it to "Firet" How cheap to change it 3 weeks later... I would like to know what members were involved that CB pls. That information is not showing in the BL News. Perhaps you can provide a SS to look at. Or maybe RnT would be kind enough to tell us if they remember. Thanks. Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: Typhy on January 21, 2003, 05:57:04 am To start off, Rapid, Infection; you're both good friends of mine, please don't take offense to my post, it is simply my thoughts in regards to this situation.
To start, that CB that was aparently done by "FiRE T". I remember that CB, because of the trouble with it. I belive that the players for FiRE ( not FiRE T, but FiRE ) were Hazard, Mattster, and Psyks. - There was a problem in this CB, Mattster kept having to leave, so it was pretty much a 2v3. The final score was 7-5. This win should be given to RnT over FiRE, not FiRE T; Infection, I seriously hope that was just an accident. I have no problem with FT being on the ladder, infact, I think it's a good idea for 2 reasons. 1.) It avoids having problems with non FiRE members ( aparently ) playing in CBs, like apparently happened in the FiRE vs AK CB. 2.) It gives the people who FiRE is training a chance to get battle experience against real clans. The only time in which I would have a problem with this, is if FiRE decides that because FT is a sub of FiRE, that FT members can play alongside FiRE members in CBs, if they win, count the win to FiRE, if they lose, count it against FT, that would just be cheap. My opinion is that this shouldn't be adressed unless it becomes a problem. I know both Haztard and Infection well, and I consider them both to be fair people, who wouldn't pull some cheap stunt like CBing their trainees. Conclusion: RnT of course should have their win counted over FiRE, not over FiRE Training, since Hazard, Mattster, and Psyks are all FiRE members. - The problem of having them on the battle league should only be adressed if FiRE decides to CB their trainee, also, FiRE and FiRE memebers obviously shouldn't be able to switch between those two clans. Regards, Typhy Title: Re:Question about clan "FT:" Post by: †FiRE Infection on January 21, 2003, 11:03:40 pm No Typhy, Fire trainees would not ever be cbing with Fire members untill a trainee would make the full clan.
|