Title: Israel Post by: Cossack on January 17, 2003, 11:41:59 pm Israel, one of the most dogmatic facist countries on the face of the earth and this is why. Israel has treated Muslim Palestinians as second class citizens. Palestinians are not allowed to vote, they are not allowed to run for office, and are in no way shape or form represented in the Isreali Knesset (parliament). The Isrealis bulldozed down whole neighborhoods of innocent civilians just because there is one suspected Hamas agent. The IDF has attacked Palestinian school houses, poisoned their wells with cyanide (yes there is proof for this outrageous claim). Sharon has just issued permission for the MOSSAD (Israel's KGB or CIA) to carry out assasinations on AMERICAN SOIL AND AROUND THE WORLD! I dont care what way you put it, but those are foreign assasins running through our streets! 40 billion dollars of our own hard earned tax money is spent each year for Israel! We are funding a dogmatic government that provokes wars, invades smaller countries (ie Lebenon), shoots at American vessels (see USS Liberty) kills innocent civilians, bulldozes down homes, and hides 100-200 small scale nuclear warheads. It is clear that both sides are not innocent, but how the hell can we reach any agreement, or even more importantly how can we expect to be neutral for much longer? The Isreali regime has broken 116 UN resolution, thats a hell of alot more resolutions than Iraq has broken. I am not against the existence of the state of Israel, I am against us funding them!
Keep in mind I hate the Zionist Government and those that support its actions, I am in no way against the Jewish People, I am not an anti-semite, I am an anti-Zionist. To understand the Zionist movement you have to go back the days after WWII. You will see that its principles are founded of of dogmatic points. Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 18, 2003, 12:44:51 am I'm agree with you 100% Cossack, the Israelic government has been taking way too many liberties and has been allowed to do so with American consent. I don't think it's strange for the Palestinians to be outraged over the Israeli violations when they are acting like pure fascists. >:(
[Edited grammar error.] Title: Re:Israel Post by: KoS PY.nq.ict on January 18, 2003, 02:35:30 am I agree with you too my yummy sack.
Now I'll post a counter argument for the hell of it. Israel's a valuable ally in the middle east. Ever since the formation of their country the United States has backed all their actions. We share technologies and intelligence. They're practically a puppet country. Yes they've committed some hanoues acts but they have every right to do so. For years the palestinian terrorist groups have been bombing innocent civilian (Israeli) targets. It's gotten to the point where the Israeli government doesn't care how the military handles these attacks. They are allowed to train their troops and assassination squads with guerilla tactics. This form of fighting is needed in order to counter the increasing danger of palestinian bombings. Besides, before the time of Jesus Christ palestinians and jews have been battling for religious domination. They are taught to hate each other. Think of this...jews that may live in palestinian countries are treated the exact same way palestinians are treated in Israel. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Title: Re:Israel Post by: Cossack on January 18, 2003, 05:33:30 am The Jordanians arent bulldozing down whole Jewish neighborhoods though. On another note, I wouldnt care what happened in Israel, I could care less if they killed a bunch of Palestinians, but when I am paying them through my taxes, I have a problem.
Title: Re:Israel Post by: |MP|Buccaneer on January 18, 2003, 08:07:11 am One note. Not everything is black and white. You are talking as if America approves of the way in which Isreal treats the Palistinians. And I bet it's because we know they do it and still give them aid.
Well first off, while I myself don't approve of how they do things, they aren't doing the ethnic genocide that was going on in Bosnia either. They more or less just discriminate in a big way. Secondly, unlike major world powers, countries in the middle east do not have a seperation of church and state. You don't see a Palistinian in government there, nor do you see a jew in the government of Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc. Thrid (doesn't thirdly sound gay), The Isrealies only formed a government 50 odd years ago. We had well over 120 year after we formed a government where we did much much worse to the people that lived here before us. Many more years then that before we formed our own government. You could say much the same about Russia and the way it treated many of the peoples from Siberia, Urals, etc. To jump all over them would be hypocritical to say the least. Especially when they aren't really comitting "crimes" al la the old Yugoslovia and other parts of the world. Last. While Isreal's treatment of the muslum is only slightly better then say, South Africa used to be in it's treatment of blacks, why don't we sanction it at all like we did South Africa? Now the reactionist would say that Jew's control the government here. That would be very wrong. The real truth is, Isreal is that hardly tame, viscous half wolf, half dog, that we keep on a chain in the back yard. It keeps things "sane" for us, from our point of view. The US keeps Isreal from kicking the asses of some of it's neighbors (and Isreal has proven that it can do just that in the past), and OPEC doesn't lower production quotas to artifically inflate the cost of oil anymore. Isreal is the great equalizer from our point of view in the middle east. Isreal needs us, we need them. This argument isn't morally correct, but since when did morality really enter the political picture? Answer: only when they cross a line. But Isreal hasn't crossed it yet. Title: Re:Israel Post by: *DAMN Bander on January 18, 2003, 12:12:56 pm Think of this...jews that may live in palestinian countries are treated the exact same way palestinians are treated in Israel. First off: There is NO palestinian state neither palestinian countrys. Palestinians are refugees all over the world. The rest of what u talked is just a plain lie. In fact the Jewish culture always had friendly ties to the arabic world - at last before the founding of the state of israel (tnx to british colonial times). If u really think its true what u said u have no clue about the circumstandes of muslim or christian palestinian people who live under israeli occupation. Cossak: Word! Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 18, 2003, 01:54:40 pm Pyrex, actually, Islam didn't exist before Jesus. And even when Islam was introduced in the 800's or something like that, they were really friendly towards the Jews, there were no real Islam-Jewish fights until the Jews reoccupied Israel.
Also, keep in mind that what Muhammed preached is not what the radical Muslims believe in now, they've built a way more militaristic interpretation of it, therefore -Islam- is not to blame for anything. I think it's clear that Israel has crossed the line already, so has the Palestinians. The Palestinians have nothing to throw against the Israelis and therefore they reside to more drastic measures, and then the Israelis counter with even more, it's all just a downward spiral. Title: Re:Israel Post by: SK(Home) on January 18, 2003, 04:24:12 pm One note. Not everything is black and white. hehe like your icon =) yah i have to agree with buc in this situation isreal hasnt really done any thing bad but if they do, =/ Title: Re:Israel Post by: Mr.Mellow on January 19, 2003, 05:01:37 am Hmm, I have to say both Coss's, Py's, and Buck's (Bucc looks funny) opinions are all very well laid out and organized. I agree with Coss on how Israel gets away with a lot more then they should. Research the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty for proof, like Coss said. I also agree with Buck that Israel is an equalizer. I'm not going to comment on the other things, because I don't have enough knowledge on them. I must say that while Israel does make brutal retaliations normally, they can show restraint. During the Gulf War, when Iraq was launching scuds at them, Israel showed great restraint by not invading Iraq. If they had, it would have destabalized the region, and the war would have gotten much more complicated. Anyhoo, just my 2 cents.
Title: Re:Israel Post by: (SiX)Ben on January 19, 2003, 07:35:53 am I gotta side with Bucc here... It sounds like you're accusing America of aiding Israel. I hate to make this globalation AGAIN, but all this is geo politics. Israel makes the best computer chips... Computer chips, You Cossack, are you using to run your computer. America needs these chips. We keep good trade with Israel, we get it. If things get tense with Israel, they could shut off their trade with us, which would make America's economy even worse off then it is right now. Note: Israel IS the main source for electronics chips and other essentials in economy today. America and other countries are forced to look the other way for the good of their economies.
Also, note Israel has been pushed around for a LOOOONG time. When they finally got their own country a brutal war broke out. Israel HAS shown tremendous restraint in every aspect of war, including with its nuclear weapons. It could kick most countries asses in a heartbeat, but it doesn't. Palestine is a fraction of what Israel could do. Finally, I like to think of Israel as "America in the Middle East". Look at them. They are the superpower in their region. So, many other countries rely on them. They have nukes, they are allies with most everyone. Sure, they make mistakes. Dare I remind you what America and Russia has done to it's and other countries people in the past? Ben Title: Re:Israel Post by: *DAMN Bander on January 20, 2003, 03:13:24 am Also, note Israel has been pushed around for a LOOOONG time. When they finally got their own country a brutal war broke out. Muahaha. Listen: If i come home after work and i find u chilling in my flat, and wehn i ask u then:" Excuse me, what are u doing here? Who let u in?" - and if ur answer will be: "Oh, didnt u hear that? This is nor MY flat, the british gave it to me" - then u CAN be VERY sure that a brutal war will break out also. Damnit. Whoever posted that Israel "didnt really do any bad" up there is a Idiot. Peace ~ Title: Re:Israel Post by: jn.loudnotes on January 20, 2003, 06:36:53 am Lol Bander. . .good to hear from you again. But what if your great-great-great-greatx100 grandfather stole the flat. And you of course don't remember this, and it's not your fault. But then the guy who came into your flat to chill was the grandson of the guy whose flat your ancestor stole. And he'd been living on the streets because he didn't have a flat anymore.
Now, if you could all just get along and share the flat, things would be fine. But unfortunately, the hobo is still mad at your grandpa for stealing his flat, and so he's mad at you too. . .and you're mad at him for coming into your flat. So. . .is either side really right? The silly thing is, everything happened so many thousands of years ago, that there's no point in continuing all the shit. It's not like you can tell the difference between a Jew and an Arab just by looking at them. If people could just ignore their religions for a bit, they would be able to live right next to each other without any trouble. Nah. . .that's too sensible. . .instead we should all suicide bomb each other. Title: Re:Israel Post by: EUR_Zaitsev on January 20, 2003, 04:12:07 pm Cossack I agree and I dont. I agree that we shouldnt fund them and without better rights they should be allowed to break away.
I disagree with certainly what you feel differently about. Palestine and Isreal very nearly is the same as Chechnia and Russia. not exactly the same but somewhat the same. Not I know there are terror attacks by Chechniyans on your country I remember you saying one was a few blocks away from you but Russia commits countless attrocities that equal if not better the ammount conducted by Chechnia. What is so wrong with them being free. Title: Re:Israel Post by: (SiX)Ben on January 21, 2003, 08:11:28 am **Cowers in fear at Cossacks response, yet watches on with interest oas Cossy is going to go crazy on Zai**
Ben Title: Re:Israel Post by: abe on January 21, 2003, 08:25:52 pm I think there are many parralels b/w the russian war in chechenya and isreal's actions in the occupied territories...
and i doubt that any of you have an idea of what it is like to lose freinds or family in a suicide bombing or ambush so u are in no position to judge israel that harshly. If the US or any other major world power was in a comparable situation, i assure u they would act the exact same way. picture fanatical mexicans running across the border and blowing up Barns and Nobleses all over texas...dont u think the US would begin treating mexicans with a little more suspicion. i do. the biggest danger in looking at the middle-east mess is to look at only one side of the story and thats exactly what cossack and all u others are doing.... if u only see the part of the news in which they describe an IDF raid in which a Hamas activist is killed along with his family, but not the one about the suicide bombing that sparked the assault, ure only getting half the story. it is very easy to get caught up on either side of the argument because there is so much debate and propaganda from both sides on the topic. that just my opinion, i could be wrong Title: Re:Israel Post by: Cossack on January 22, 2003, 06:24:45 am To Zait: I know you are very ignorant of the Chechen situation, it is not in the news that often, nor do many Americans know about it. I do not beleive in an independent Chechnya, but I also do not beleive in what the Russian Government is doing there. I may have made some anti-chechen outbursts on these forums in the past, but I am in favor of peaceful solutions. Now a days the Chechens arent even fighting, they are Al Queda and do not represent the opinion of the War-wary Chechen people or the legitimate Chechen Government. Plus this post was about Israel, I did not mention Chechnya once here. Keep in mind, the Russians are not attempting to push the Chechens out of Chechnya, they are tring to make the people of Russia to become bonded to the land and their common history instead of their ethnicity, unlike Israel who is tring to expand their Jewish State.
To Pro-Isrealis, you say that Israel has performed amazing restraint in these past 50 years? WRONG! Israel has instegated wars, and they started the Yom Kippur War by performing a pre-emptive strike on Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt. American history books will say Israel did not start it, but the facts remain that Israel shot first. Some constraint if you ask me. Israel did not bomb Iraq when they "SCUDed" them, because America was doing that for them. Yet this is not an argument of Israel's might, but the morals behind its action and how we are funding them. I for one do not want my tax dollars to fund an American made hellfire rocket shot into a Palestinian School house. I am still awaiting response to the USS Liberty incident. Please do not read Israel's denials, but the experience as told by the crew members aboard that ship. To Abe: Overhere (in Texas) I hear more about the casualties the suicide bomber caused to Israelis than what the Israelis caused to the Palestinians. The media companies are owned by Zionists. This is know secret, so it is natural that Americans favor Israel more. Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 22, 2003, 09:19:36 am Well I just heard about the Israelis mowing down a whole Palestinian town and a Hospital because they were built illegally, atleast the Palestinians don't mow down the illegal Israelian settlements.
Title: Re:Israel Post by: Ace on January 22, 2003, 09:40:17 am Well I just heard about the Israelis mowing down a whole Palestinian town and a Hospital because they were built illegally, atleast the Palestinians don't mow down the illegal Israelian settlements. Yeah, they just strap explosives to their body and blow themselves up around as many innocent law-abiding Israeli citizens, all while bastardizing Islam. Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 22, 2003, 10:01:39 am No one can defend suicide bombing, but no one can defend mowing down a hosptial either.
Title: Re:Israel Post by: Ace on January 22, 2003, 10:34:34 am Mind backing up that claim? I read about that and it was just some commercial buildings build illegaly that were bulldozed. There was no mention of a hospital.
Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 22, 2003, 12:16:24 pm Sure I'll back it up, I was wrong about one detail though, it wasn't a hospital, it was a medical center and a pharmacy.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2680777.stm Title: Re:Israel Post by: EUR_Zaitsev on January 22, 2003, 01:05:11 pm Cossock, It is true I may be rather ignorent on Chechnyia but I just find it interesting your so powerfully against Isreal but you dont turn to your own country. What about that gas tha putin used or those "military Roundups" where all Chechnian men Were taken in trucks and few returned? There are still tragedies occuring in Chechnyia weather the Ignorent Media reports on it or not. Who reports on Africa any morE? Nobdy because once violence happens all the time it no longer becomes news. Could this have happen in Chechnyia? I doubt it but the Russian Governement is wrong in this case and you cant use military to sew up a tear of independence it wont work because those feelings of difference will not change at gun point.
Title: Re:Israel Post by: Cossack on January 22, 2003, 03:11:43 pm You talking about the incapacitating gas they used in the opera? Let me see, I support that action because there were 50 Chechens straped with dynomite, they mined the entrances into the opera, and they had a very large explosive charge tied around one of the main support collums. Also didnt I say I did not support military action and what the Russian Government was doing?
Title: Re:Israel Post by: abe on January 22, 2003, 06:37:31 pm cossack,
i think u have your facts somwhat confused.....the yom kippur (or october war, 1973) war was, without any question (even from the arabs) started by Egypt and Syria. It was a sneak attack that was carried out on the yom kippur (day of atonment, the most important jewish holiday btw) and was not as you claim a response to any sort of pre-emptive strike on israel's part. u were probably thinking of the six-day war (1967). and about what you said was biased media report by the 'zionist' media in the US, the same argument is made by israelis, who feel that the coverage of the conflict (esp. on CNN and BBC) are completely biased towards the palistinians. the claim about media-bias is completely useless and irrelevant, because "the media" is a rather broad term and accusing it of generally being biased is not helpful. cossack, there is a book you should read if u havent already called 'Fateful triangle' by noam chomsky. it discusses the relationship btw the US, Israel and the Palistinians and hes very critical of Israel and the US' complicity. although i dont share most of his views, it is a good book...its much in the same vein as many comments u have made here and im sure you would enjoy it. zaitsef, u made a very good point about the media: 3 million ppl have died in Congo (fmr.Zaire) in the past 3 years, compared to some 2000-2500 in the current intifada, yet there is virtually no coverage of Congo, just like there is very little about chechenya. and as far as bulldozing the houses of suicide bombers...how the hell can u have a problem with that? there arent many ways to discourage somone who wants to blow themself up, but threatening to bulldoze their families house and sending them into exile might make them think. which brings me to a broader point: the IDF, for all its reported abuses, has made it nearly impossible for suicide bombers to enter Israel proper and most of the attacks in recent months have been on settlements. and they have stopped many bombers trying to get into Israel. to me that means that they are doing a good job. if it wasnt for all the brutality and ruthlessness that u guys are whining about, i dont think this would be the case. Where i disagree with israel's tactics is in their treatment of the PA (Palestinian Authority), which they have destroyed rather then use it to fight the terrorist. imo, this is b/c sharon and arafat have been enemies for so long that they cant just act like nothing ever happened and be freinds (i can hardly think of any world leaders that hate eachother more). until both arafat and sharon are around, there will be no peace.... and cossack, the only reason you are making a distinction b/w chechenya and the occupied territories is b/c u r russian. if u were israeli im sure u would see russia as the bad guy, and israel simply as defending itself. Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 22, 2003, 07:44:55 pm Of course it's one sided but i see the other side all the time, hence this clipping.
I've got tons of evidence, enough to conclude that Israel runs our Mideast policy, they say so themselves. This is the single greatest cause of injustice in the Mid east. Injustice =War. There will be no peace regardless of Sharon or Arafat, as long as the US supports Zionazi's there will be war. From: Arjan El Fassed Here, in chronological order, is a list of twelve major tactics of modern terrorism and the dates of their first introduction into the conflict over Palestine by members of the Irgun or Stern gang, (zionist terrorists which included Arial Sharon) and in one case by the Hagana, which was the military organisation of the Jewish Agency. Four of the twelve incidents, it should be noted, took place outside the borders of Palestine and are thus also early instances of international terrorism: 1. Grenade in cafes: first used against Palestinians in Jerusalem, 17 March 1937 (Colonial 146, HM Stationary Office, London, 1938); 2. Delayed-action, electrically timed mines in crowded market places: first used against Palestinians in Haifa, 6 July 1938 (Sefer Toldot Ha Haganah, Tel Aviv: Zionist Library and Marakot, 1954-1972: "This tactic was the fruit of the planning of a number of young ETZEL [i.e., Irgun] leaders" (Chapt. 43, p. 812); 3. Blowing up a ship with its civilian passengers still on board: first used in Haifa, 25 November 1940. Although the action was politically aimed at the British, the ship in question, the Patria, had 1700 Jewish immigrants on board (the incident caused the death of 252 Jewish illegal immigrants and British police personnel, according to "A Survey of Palestine, Jerusalem: Government Printer, 1946), vol. I, p. 61; see also Munya M. Mardor, Strictly Illegal (London, 1957, pp. 56ff). Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 22, 2003, 07:46:51 pm Ther rest of em Taking of hostages to put pressure on a government:
first used against the British in Tel Aviv, 18 June 1946 (see R.D. Wilson, Cordon and Search (Aldershot: Gale and Polden, 1949), p. 55. Wilson, the official historian of the Sixth Airborne Division in Palestine, describes the incident as "a new development in lawlessness". The individuals kidnapped were five British officers. See also Supplementary Memorandum by the Government of Palestine (Jerusalem: Government Printer, 1947), p. 12; 6. Blowing up of government offices with their civilian employees and visitors: first used against the British in Jerusalem, 22 July 1946. The toll was 91 dead and 46 wounded. This is the notorious King David Hotel incident. The mastermind behind the attack was Menachem Begin, the late PM of Israel. The event is described in detail in Thurston Clarke's By Blood and Fire (London: Hutchinson, 1981). In the blurb of the book, Dominique Lapierre describes the event as "the first massive terrorist political action of modern history". See also R.D. Wilson, op. cit., pp. 63ff; 7. Blowing up of embassy outside Palestine with a booby-trapped suitcase: first used against the British Embassy in Rome, 31 October 1946. See Nicholas Bethel, The Palestine Triangle (London: Andre Deutsch, 1979), p. 289; 8. Booby-trapped car parked alongside buildings: first used against the British in Sarafand (east of Jaffa) on 5 December 1946. This was probably the first use anywhere of this device. On this occasion, two were killed and 28 injured. R.D. Wilson, Cordon and Search (Aldershot: Gale and Polden, 1949), p. 259; 9. Whipping of hostages as a reprisal for government actions: first used against British in Tel Aviv, Natanya and Rishon-le-Zion, 29 December 1946. The victims were a British army major and three British non-commissioned officers. Supplementary Memorandum by the Government of Palestine (Jerusalem: Government Printer, 1947), p. 24, see R.D. Wilson, Cordon and Search (Aldershot: Gale and Polden, 1949), p. 87; see also Nicholas Bethel, The Palestine Triangle (London: Andre Deutsch, 1979), p. 291; 10. Letter-bombs sent to politicians outside Palestine: first used against Britain when 20 letter bombs were sent from Italy to London between 4 June and 6 June 1947. The first batch of 8 letter-bombs arrived in London on 4 June 1947. One letter was addressed to Sir Stafford Crips, Minister at the Board of trade, and another to Mr. John Strachey, Minister of Food. All were intercepted by Scotland Yard, whose investigations indicated that this was "another attempt by Jewish terrorists to intimadate responsible people in this country" (The Times, 5 June 1947, p. 4). Three more letter bombs were intercepted on 5 June. One of these was addressed to Mr. Ernest Bevin, Foreign Secretary, another to Mr. Anthony Eden, former Foreign Secretary, and the third to Mr. Arthur Greenwood, Minister Without Portfolio (The Times, 6 June 1947, p. 4). On 6 June, nine more letters were intercepted. The content of each were said to be capable of "making a hole in a steel plate (The Times, 7 June 1947). On 9 June, two Zionists were arrested by the Belgian police trying to smuggle 6 letter-bombs addressed to prominent people in Britain (The Times, 10 June 1947). The man who made these bombs was Yaacov Eliav, who was the bomb expert of the Stern Gang, as he himself acknowledged to the Sunday Times of London (24 September 1972); 11. Murder of hostages as a reprisal for government actions: first used against the British in the Natanya area on 29 July 1947. The victims were two British NCOs, Martin and Paice, kidnapped on 12 July 1947. On 31 July, there were found "hanging from a eucalyptus tree...The area for some distance round was mined and as one of the bodies was cut down, it exploded, having been booby-trapped. In this explosion, a British officer was severely wounded". R.D. Wilson, Cordon and Search (Aldershot: Gale and Polden, 1949), p. 132. Menachem Begin gave the order to hang the two NCOs. For his defense of his action, see Nicholas Bethel, The Palestine Triangle (London: Andre Deutsch, 1979), p. 338. 12.Postal parcel-bomb sent outside Palestine: first used against the British in London, 3 September 1947. The bomb was addressed to a Brigadier in Intelligence at the War Office, according to the Sunday Times of London (24 September 1972). It exploded in a London district post office at Howick Place, Victoria Street, injuring two postmen (The Times, 4 September 1947, p. 6. For several months there had been persisent reports from field intelligence that the Irgun or Stern were planning a bombing campaign in Britain. See Nicholas Bethel, The Palestine Triangle (London: Andre Deutsch, 1979), p. 348; Sunday Times, 24 September 1972. See also: Walid Khalidi, Palestine Reborn, London: IB Tauris, 1992, Chapter 5. Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 22, 2003, 07:49:49 pm Evidence:
The road map to peace... but first lest go to War. Can you conclude the Israel dominates US policy-making? http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=253422&contrassID=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y clippings "He is considered to be the architect behind the current closing in on Iraq, a clear supporter of Israel, and a leading member of the Jewish right in Washington, which includes Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, and the National Security Council adviser on the Middle East, Elliot Abrams." "Wolfowitz has family, including a sister, in Israel, and is well-acquainted with many members of the government, including Nathan Sharansky and former ambassador to Washington, David Ivry." Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 22, 2003, 08:03:31 pm BTW, collective punishement is a war crime, the US made, catepillar bulldozers that you and I pay for are a part of this, just yesterday our perpetually whining, always demanding money, High moral fiber ally bulldozed the hell out of 60 Palestinan shops While building a new Berlin Wall all with our money. How many new terrorists has this single event created? jus askin
Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 22, 2003, 10:23:56 pm Klatu, and these were all Jewish attacks on the British? I'm shocked.
Israel has been abusing the goodwill of the world for a long time and it has got to stop. They don't give a shit about what the rest of the world thinks anymore because they've got the American government wrapped around their finger. Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 22, 2003, 11:04:53 pm Oh I've got much much more. Zionism is an extremist movement. The fact that they're PR is successful does not lessen the truth that this incarnation of Zionism is Religio-Facscist-Racist. Let me ask one question, a question which has far reaching implications.
Is being a Jew belonging to a race? Isn't being a Jew merely another religion? I think I want to have a state for my religion too, right there in Washington DC, I've got some Indian blood, Heck I've even had myself a holocaust to make folks feel extra sorry for me. I declare the right of return and will go to Washington and I think I like that funky looking White House over there the one with the Resident in it. I need to get some backing though from the banks, the media, the superpower of the month, this could take some time. Here look at this well sourced article. This is what the war is about http://www.geocities.com/roundtable_texts/zionistplan.html Next time they start talking making up reasons for the war think about this map. Draw your conclusions. Title: Re:Israel Post by: Ace on January 22, 2003, 11:39:47 pm BTW, collective punishement is a war crime, the US made, catepillar bulldozers that you and I pay for are a part of this, just yesterday our perpetually whining, always demanding money, High moral fiber ally bulldozed the hell out of 60 Palestinan shops While building a new Berlin Wall all with our money. How many new terrorists has this single event created? jus askin They bulldozed 28 shops as I read in the San Jose Mercury.. The report of 60 (actually 62) came from the mayor of the town. I'm far more willing to trust the figures of a news agency than a biased mayor. Remember, these buildings were built illegaly. It is also reported that the proprietors were given ample warning. Title: Re:Israel Post by: PsYcO aSsAsSiN on January 22, 2003, 11:53:13 pm I read something above about media coverage...so here it goes concerning what is covered and what isnt.
a) We don't give a fuck about African strife because it is always happening non-stop and it really doesn't affect many people in the United States/Europe where you get your news. This is the same reason why you can never buy a map of Africa because the borders and names are always changing... b) We don't hear about Chechyna anymore because the Russian government has banned all media sources that don't have explicit special permission from the province...meaning that anyone sheding Russia in bad light doesn't get to go there. c) The Israel/Palestinean conflict gets the attention because it is happening at a major place for 3 of the world's major religions...that is why it is known as "The Holy Land." On the topic of Chechnya, does anyone else remember the chemical shelling of Grozny? Title: Re:Israel Post by: EUR_Zaitsev on January 23, 2003, 12:26:55 am Well Cossock then we are arguing at to points on the same side yet About Isreal I dont support thier way of solving things, launching 4 missiles at a residental neighborhood to kill 1 cheif or something. STUPID. When a dog is cornered, its more dangerous, daily, Palestenians have less to live for and less reason to want to stay alive
Title: Re:Israel Post by: abe on January 23, 2003, 12:34:13 am yes kami they were all attacks against the british and were carried out while they held the mandate (read colony) over the area and were all before Isreal's creation as a state in 1948. that is excactly why citing them, while historically interesting, is not relevant to the question: the government of israel did not carry out any of these attacks. it didnt even exist, yet. individuals that would later be part of that government, yes, but not the state of israel. and besides, do we accuse george washington of being a terrorist and starting a "terrorist state" because he fought the british and created the usa? no.
and as far as that buisness about demolishing illegal houses goes, the army bulldozes many illegal israeli settlement outposts as well. i dont see links to any story about that. omg, i just read your last post Klatu and just tell me one thing: WtF, man? are u going to quote the protocols of the elders of zion now? or how about Mein Kampf? are u going to tell me that jews are plotting to overthrow the world? no offense man, but wtf? i agree that israel is a somwhat militaritic society, but "Religio-Facscist-Racist" or whatever...security complex, maybe but they arent fascists/racists or all religious (there are as many secular israelis as there are secular americans). bah, ive had enough of this for right now, laterz Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 23, 2003, 01:29:52 am Quote Quote The buildings were built illegally? What about the Israeli settlements! Are they "legal" C'mon guy! Plus collective punishmnet is still a war crime if it is 28 or 60 shops. Israel is in contravention of over 100 UN resolutions. The formula stands and becomes longer: hypocrisy = injustice=War. Is being jewish a race or a religion? I'm far more willing to trust a mayor that a Jewish owned media outlet. But to each his own, the salient points stand. collective punishement is a war crime, the US made, catepillar bulldozers that you and I pay for are a part of this, just yesterday our perpetually whining, always demanding money, High moral fiber ally bulldozed the hell out of 60 Palestinan shops While building a new Berlin Wall all with our money. How many new terrorists has this single event created? jus askin They bulldozed 28 shops as I read in the San Jose Mercury.. The report of 60 (actually 62) came from the mayor of the town. I'm far more willing to trust the figures of a news agency than a biased mayor. Remember, these buildings were built illegaly. It is also reported that the proprietors were given ample warning. Title: Re:Israel Post by: Klatu on January 23, 2003, 02:04:46 am Quote The terrorist attacks of Israel are not relevant? HUH says who? I think they are very relevant. They go right to the heart of the matter, the creation of Israel. OMgawd are you gonna call me and anti Semite next? That's the very first thing an apologist or one brainwashed by Israel does when cornered, whip out the anti Semite nonsense word, the holocaust etc. Next I'll be personally responsible for breaking Anne Franks pencil. Now having said that I'll not say your an apologist for Israel, not yet but I think you are taking that path just as you think iI'm taking the path to what would properly be called Anti-Jew. I have nothing against the Jewish religion my friend. Nothing more than I have against organized religions in general. Look. Lets not go down this path which always results in name calling. Why not tell me why my evidence is wrong. I'll support my use of he word Religio: Israel was created for Jews alone, it is in their writings. This means the Jewish religion or Zionist Cult if you will. There are many laws pertainig to the primacy of Judaism. Therefore I use the word RELIGIO. It's a made up word, it means there is no separation between church and state. I'll get to the fascist and racist part later if you wish but I'd rather move on to larger more important aspects. The fascist and racist evidence will become apparent. In fact, to facilitate this let me withdraw the word Fascist and Racist. The Protocols of Zion, Actually the origins are inconclusive. There is no proof for either view. I don't know who wrote them or if they are authenitc, but somebody did and whoever did was one devious, clever, and maybe brilliant strategist. If I were wanting to take over something, like the world, I would add it to my arsenal. yomg, i just read your last post Klatu and just tell me one thing: WtF, man? are u going to quote the protocols of the elders of zion now? or how about Mein Kampf? are u going to tell me that jews are plotting to overthrow the world? no offense man, but wtf? i agree that israel is a somwhat militaritic society, but "Religio-Facscist-Racist" or whatever...security complex, maybe but they arent fascists/racists or all religious (there are as many secular israelis as there are secular americans). bah, ive had enough of this for right now, laterz Title: Re:Israel Post by: Cossack on January 23, 2003, 06:16:10 am I remember the chemical shelling of Groznyy. Yes wasnt it in the movie "Sum of all Fears"? Assasin, Russia did not shell Grozny with chemical weapons, people would have noticed, even with the small amount of media coverage available. You have your facts mixed up there. However there have been reports of chemical shelling in the Mountains, but that still remains to be proven. It is true there was shelling in Grozny in 1996, but they were not chemical, send me a link to proove me wrong otherwise. It still does not change my stance of Russia's military actions.
As for Israel, they can kill as many palestinians as they want, gas as many children as they want, as long as I am not paying for them. The money we give to them could be used for other useful things for our own country. As for Zaitsev, I complained about Israel instead of Chechnya because I am paying for Israel just like many Americans on this board that are of age. I dont know any Russians of age here that are paying for Chechnya through their taxes. I put Israel on the spot because I thought everyone had a common knowledge on the crisis as opposed to Israel. Title: Re:Israel Post by: abe on January 24, 2003, 12:36:56 am Klatu, you need to chill out my freind...
ok, lets go in order: the reason i say that citing attacks by jews in the area before 1948 is irrelevant is that tHERE WAS NO JEWISH StAtE At tHE tIME. once independance was achieved, israel commited itself to behaving like any other responsible state. and thats that. there were also incidents of terrorism and attacks on jews and british by palestinians....i dont see u cite any references to those. unlike other countries in the region (namely Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria) the state of israel has never used terrorism as a political tool. they may have strong-handed tactics and have carried out executions of wanted terrorists abroad (notably the Black September group after they murdered the israeli team at the munich olympics in the early 70s). next: buddy, if you read over my post carefully, you will find that i didnt accuse u of being anything. i was merely making a point about the information u are citing: its is biased, its is propaganda and in my opinion garbage: just like mein kampf. i take anything that is published by an association with this name (Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.) with a grain of salt, as i assume u do with materials published by israels ministry for foreign affairs, the IDF or the anti-defamation league. I don't cite those here, b/c i realize that they are biased and one-sided and not helpful in this instance. klatu, never accused u of being an anti-semite or of, as u tactlessly put it, "breaking anne frank's pencil". just in case u havent noticed: over the past ten years, a lot of the same propaganda used by the nazis in the 30s and 40s is now very popular among palestinians and in many arab countries. that is why is why i was relating your inability to critically examine the sources u quote to nazi and anti-semetic propaganda, and not because i think u hate jews. and i seriously resent your implication that i do.....schmuck now as for your question about whether jews are a race/ethnic group or a religion. well, in the strictist sense u may be right that judaism is a religion and not an ethnic identity, however, it also fits most of the definitions of a culture, ethnic group or race, as u put it. jews have a common language (hebrew today, yiddish before 1948) and common values, tradtions and cultural features. furthermore, for the past 2000 years jews have been characterized as being different by gentiles so that it was not simply by choice that jews became an ethnic community and not a just a religion. next, the "religio" thing. im sure you are aware that 20 percent of the israeli population is of arab descent. these israeli arabs are citizens, they are entitled to vote and posess all the rights of any jewish israeli citizen. granted, u can only emigrate to israel if ure a jew, but thats the whole point. and last but not least: WtF? there are questions as to who wrote the Protocols? Wtf planet are u living on, man?? those things were written y some tzarist secret police guy, who thought he could deflect attention from how shitty the tzars work was at home, y getting everyone pissed at the jews. tHIS IS A FACt. and there is no question. i recommend u look it up or ask somone who knows aout history. i dont think ure a anti-semite, klatu, i just think your somewhat misinformed and uncritical of your sources (at least when it comes to the pro-palestinian ones. as far as your comment aout me going down the "apologist road" is just stupid. i disagree with the settlement policies and with many of the decisions made by the latest likud govt, and i am on some issues critical of the israeli govt. id rather see a guy like mitznah be pm in israel because i dont think that a permanent solution is achievable thorugh force. sharon and arafat ARE key to the question. arafat has locked himself into the corner by telling his supporters he wont accept a final status solution that doesnt include the right of return for palestinians who lost their homes in 48. such a provision would kill the jewish character of the state of israel and will therefore be accepted by NO israeli government, no matter how comitted to peace it is. and sharon...., well, i think u can probably answer that one yourself. unless these two men (and the generation they represent) step aside and let the next generation of israelis and palestinians asume their roles, there will be no peace. if you compare the minimal expectations of young ppl on both sides for the outcome of the conflict, you will find that, on the issues themselves, there is much overlap and little distance btw those of israeli youths and those of their palestinian counterpart... if you choose to ignore this, you spit right in the face of peace. for u in washington this might not mean much, but i can tell u that i does for israelis and palestinians. laterz Title: Re:Israel Post by: kami on January 24, 2003, 01:17:46 am the reason i say that citing attacks by jews in the area before 1948 is irrelevant is that tHERE WAS NO JEWISH StAtE At tHE tIME. once independance was achieved, israel commited itself to behaving like any other responsible state. and thats that. Doesn't that mean that if the Palestinians got their own state (no Jordan doesn't count) with their own borders and their own freedom, they would cease the terrorism? Title: Re:Israel Post by: Cossack on January 24, 2003, 04:49:28 am I think I should tell you who Klatu is. I know this guy personally. He is an over zealous conspiracy theorist I know. I asked him to look at my argument and tell me what he thought, apparently he decided to post his rhetoric. He does have some points though. Paul Wolfowitz is instrumental in deciding our foreign policy. He is a Zionist Jew to the extream. He allocates more of our hard earned tax dollars to Israel. The main point of my argument is that we should threaten to withdraw funding or even go further to withdraw funding. After all, your hard earned money you got from your humilating job is funding a war against a religion in Israel. If Israel continues to go down its road, it will head into open conflict with the Arab world, and maybe even drag us into it.
As for those that are critical of my stance on Chechnya. First off I could care less what happens there. I am not paying for that War through any of my taxes, I am paying for that hellfire missile that blew up a Palestinian Schoolhouse. I am a strong beleiver in let countries do what they want inside their borders. Let the Italians kill all the Austrians in Tyrol, let the Chinese kill all the Uighers in Western China, let Russia kill all the Chechens, let the Isrealis kill all the Palestinians, and let Iraq kill all the Kurds. As long as it does not spill over and I am not the one supporting it through my hard earned tax dollars I could give a shit. Since I do pay for what the Isrealis are doing, I have a problem. Title: Re:Israel Post by: jim davis on March 06, 2006, 08:23:15 pm If Arjan Fassad had actually read "Strickly Illegal" Rather than gone for a quick check on line, he would have known that The Petra and all 250 passengers were being held in Haifa because the British would not allow them onto the land. Therefore, the only way for hagana to get these immigants into the country would be to get them off the ship -- hence the explosive charge -- But what Hagana didn't realize was how weak and internally rotted away the ship'ds hull was -- redering the explosive more powerful then was expected. It was originally created to blow a small hole into the side -- causing a slow sinking that would force the british to unload the passengers, allowing them into the country. Get your facts straight buddy. Of course it's one sided but i see the other side all the time, hence this clipping. I've got tons of evidence, enough to conclude that Israel runs our Mideast policy, they say so themselves. This is the single greatest cause of injustice in the Mid east. Injustice =War. There will be no peace regardless of Sharon or Arafat, as long as the US supports Zionazi's there will be war. From: Arjan El Fassed Here, in chronological order, is a list of twelve major tactics of modern terrorism and the dates of their first introduction into the conflict over Palestine by members of the Irgun or Stern gang, (zionist terrorists which included Arial Sharon) and in one case by the Hagana, which was the military organisation of the Jewish Agency. Four of the twelve incidents, it should be noted, took place outside the borders of Palestine and are thus also early instances of international terrorism: 1. Grenade in cafes: first used against Palestinians in Jerusalem, 17 March 1937 (Colonial 146, HM Stationary Office, London, 1938); 2. Delayed-action, electrically timed mines in crowded market places: first used against Palestinians in Haifa, 6 July 1938 (Sefer Toldot Ha Haganah, Tel Aviv: Zionist Library and Marakot, 1954-1972: "This tactic was the fruit of the planning of a number of young ETZEL [i.e., Irgun] leaders" (Chapt. 43, p. 812); 3. Blowing up a ship with its civilian passengers still on board: first used in Haifa, 25 November 1940. Although the action was politically aimed at the British, the ship in question, the Patria, had 1700 Jewish immigrants on board (the incident caused the death of 252 Jewish illegal immigrants and British police personnel, according to "A Survey of Palestine, Jerusalem: Government Printer, 1946), vol. I, p. 61; see also Munya M. Mardor, Strictly Illegal (London, 1957, pp. 56ff). Title: Re: Israel Post by: BTs_FahQ2 on March 06, 2006, 08:29:50 pm Was this the result of a 2 year google quest?
Title: Re: Israel Post by: KGB on March 06, 2006, 08:44:26 pm Have to agree with FahQ2.
This is digging up relics. Title: Re: Israel Post by: Ethion on March 06, 2006, 09:56:55 pm yes, ffs.. lock this shit now, so not another flame war picks up.
Title: Re: Israel Post by: BFG on March 06, 2006, 10:02:54 pm Old Thread, if you have something new to add start a new relevant thread, don't dig up old ones
|